So, what would Wittgenstein say about the caricatures of Mohammed? Formulating this in terms of semantic scepticism, he would stipulate on the drawings and say the following: this is not a prophet! (there is a line drawn by crayons). This is point 1. Now, the point 2 says “a situation is conceivable”, which means: we can make images of him. (Tractatus 3001). The logical reversal thus is: we cannot think of what we can’t picture. If we can’t imagine God in at least a logical world, he cannot exist, because existence is perfection. So, who has negative led to the ontological (and logical) proof of God when they say you cannot draw an image of God, the God's warriors are.